Today
I visited the Goddard Space Flight Center Visitor's Center. They have a
unique theater with a globe for a screen plus a few interactive
exhibits. I sat through several of the features in the theater, which
ran for a total of 3 hours. Many of these were about climate and energy
and the relationship between the two.
Much about alternative energy as presented and also the demand for
energy in our modern world and the consequences of using carbon based
fuels. They kept presenting energy alternatives that ONLY involved
solar, wind, switch grass, and smart meters technology.
I was dumbfounded that not even a hint was given about the
existence, much less the future use of nuclear power. How can you even
begin to have a full and open discussion about energy and climate
without even mentioning the 20% contribution of nuclear? No discussion
of how new and innovative nuclear power options could be found with
research of new fuels and reactor designs. In my opinion, the federal
government made a big mistake 40 years ago in opting for focusing on
reactors that make plutonium for weapons and killing projects with made
nuclear power with less implications for proliferation of weapons and
reactors with less risk for accidents.
The general public was not served well in what I consider to be
this 'propaganda of omission'. As a tax payer and a nuclear dweeb, I
was (am) disturbed and voiced my concerns (politely) with a couple of
staff members. As a republic, we will soon, if not already, be a nation
that lacks the information to make rational decisions on how we will be
good stewards of the planet and to further improve and sustain a high
the quality of life and health for all citizens. With an abundance of
affordable and abundant energy, almost anything is possible within the
laws of physics. Some straight talk, understanding, and credible
leadership is much needed. NASA is not doing a very good job informing
the public.
Just my 2 cents worth.
No comments:
Post a Comment